This coincidentally fixes an issue about the PTM service failing to create its SharedExtSaveData archive due to the FS service not being initialized by the time the creating code runs.
Ideally I'd like to move each process to its own folder, and have a single file per process that registers the service classes, which would be in their own files inside that folder. Then each service class would just call functions from the process to complete the commands.
Involves making asserts use printf instead of the log functions (log functions are asynchronous and, as such, the log won't be printed in time)
As such, the log type argument was removed (printf obviously can't use it, and it's made obsolete by the file and line printing)
Also removed some GEKKO cruft.
Each archive now takes a mount point of either NAND or SDMC, and builds its own directory structure there, trying to simulate an HLE-friendly hardware layout
This is to better represent the hardware layout, they are still aren't quite accurate, but this better and will help a bit when implementing the other archives like NAND-RO and NAND-RW
This allows Steel Diver to boot further, some files are needed.
This is still not ready and needs a big cleanup, this will possibly be delayed until the way we handle archives is fixed (with factory classes instead of ahead-of-time creation of archives)
They will be stored in /extsavedata/SDMC and /extsavedata/NAND respectively.
Also redirect some APT_A functions to their APT_U equivalents.
Implemented the gamecoin.dat file in SharedExtSaveData in the PTM module.
Implemented formatting the savegame.
Retake a previous savegame if it exists instead of reporting them as not formatted every time a game is loaded.
This handle manager more closely mirrors the behaviour of the CTR-OS
one. In addition object ref-counts and support for DuplicateHandle have
been added.
Note that support for DuplicateHandle is still experimental, since parts
of the kernel still use Handles internally, which will likely cause
troubles if two different handles to the same object are used to e.g.
wait on a synchronization primitive.
We still don't know what the other parameters do, but they appear to be very similar to those of FormatThisUserSaveData.
Most likely FormatThisUserSaveData is just an alias for FormatSaveData with LowPathType Empty
